By R.L. Bynum

CORAL GABLES, Fla. — Slow starts have become a troubling trend that North Carolina can’t shake. The Tar Heels have been a good second-half team most of the season, but couldn’t find the rhythm Monday against Miami.

Carolina fell to 5–5 in Quad 1 games after its 75–66 loss at Miami. The Tar Heels trailed after five minutes in all but one (at Stanford) and faced halftime deficits in all but three (Ohio State, SMU and Stanford).

The lack of intensity and focus early in games is a persistent problem that the Tar Heels will have to fix, and they certainly couldn’t solve the Hurricanes’ mixing of man-to-man and zone.

Turnovers piled up early, and center Henri Veesaar called that start “kind of unacceptable.”

“We just kind of started, maybe a little loose at the start of the game, where we turned the ball over a lot,” he said. “We’ve got to do a better job of [starting games well].”

The toughness plays, the rebounds, the 50-50 balls, the disciplined possessions tilted the game early. Miami controlled the paint and made UNC pay for defensive lapses and repeatedly failing to block out under the boards.

---

Subscribe to read Tar Heel Tribune ad-free

Subscribe for a cleaner, smoother reading experience without the flashing banners, slow-loading elements, or those especially annoying pop‑up ads that interrupt the flow of the story. You’ll also get the first version of each story emailed to you. The only ads you’ll see are static, non-intrusive ads for UNC‑related books, and there are none currently on the site.

---

“What needed to work was rebounding and making those toughness plays,” UNC coach Hubert Davis said. “It’s not about missed shots. It’s about defense, rebounding and taking care of the basketball, and those are the boxes that we didn’t definitively check today.”

North Carolina stayed within striking distance at halftime despite Miami shooting 58% in the first half, but the Tar Heels never found the consistent force they needed inside. Miami finished with 46 points in the paint, repeatedly driving free to the basket or creating second chances.

Jarin Stevenson pointed to breakdowns around the rim as the root of the problem.

“Got to defend better in the paint,” Stevenson said. “A lot of that comes from messing up our switches or just offensive rebounds. So just working on that, boxing out.”

UNC’s offense also stalled in the second half, when the Tar Heels shot just 26% from the floor. Davis said UNC simply settled instead of attacking.

“They went back to man and zone. I felt like we settled instead of getting the ball [inside],” Davis said, lamenting that his team didn’t get to the free-throw line enough. “How you get to the free throw line is shots towards the basket, and we just couldn’t generate and find consistency to be able to do that, whether it was from our bigs or our guards attacking a basket.”

Stevenson said the struggles weren’t just about missing shots, but about confidence and decisiveness.

“I think it’s just us being confident in what we have,” he said. “I feel like there are some opportunities where we could just go in and make a play. I think we’ve got to be confident in that. There were good play calls. We missed some bunnies, I feel like, too.”

Veesaar echoed that Miami didn’t necessarily do anything unexpected — the issue was UNC’s execution and aggressiveness from the opening minutes.

“I feel like we’re trying to have a plan, but just to play our play,” Veesaar said. “I wouldn’t say there’s anything on the coaches more on the players. We just didn’t have the aggressiveness and the ball pressure that we needed to have.”

Miami’s physicality also showed up on the boards and in the paint, where UNC couldn’t consistently finish possessions.

“They got great size down there,” Veesaar said. “So, they did a really good job of using their size and did a good job of limiting us under the boards.”

Kyan Evans said UNC was prepared for the defensive switching between zone and man, but still struggled to flow offensively.

“Miami played a lot of different defenses,” Evans said. “So, it was different to get into the flow of the game.”

For Davis, the bigger concern wasn’t the offense’s rhythm as much as the consistent issues that keep showing up.

“Shots go in, shots … sometimes you make them, sometimes you don’t,” he said. “Stuff that shows up every day, and that’s defense, rebounding and taking care of the basketball.”

Until North Carolina solves its slow-start problem and matches opponents’ physicality from the opening tip, those boxes will remain unchecked — and Quad 1 opportunities will keep slipping away.

---

UNC schedule

Date	Month/day	Opponent/event (final ranks)
	October	Exhibitions
9	7 p.m. Friday	vs. USC in Greensboro
18	5 p.m. Sunday	vs. Indiana in Indianapolis
27	Tuesday	vs. Charlotte
	November	Regular season
2	Monday	vs. Western Carolina
6	Friday	vs. Wofford
10	Tuesday	vs. Wyoming
13	Friday	vs. Georgia
20	Friday	vs. Marshall
23	Monday	vs. Monmouth
27	Friday	Dick Vitale Invitational vs. West Virginia in Charlotte
	December
1	Tuesday	ACC/SEC Challenge vs. No. 13 Arkansas
6	Sunday	vs. Butler
12	Saturday	at Georgetown
15	Tuesday	Tobacco Road Classic vs. N.C. State in Greensboro
19	2:30 Saturday, CBS	CBS Sports Classic vs. Kentucky in New York
21	Monday	vs. The Citadel
30	Wednesday	vs. California
	January
2	Saturday	at Boston College
5	Tuesday	at Louisville
9	Saturday	vs. N.C. State
13	Wednesday	at Florida State
16	Saturday	vs. Stanford
19	Tuesday	vs. No. 17 Virginia
23	Saturday	at Syracuse
26	Tuesday	vs. SMU
30	Saturday	Nashville Hoops Showdown vs. No. 5 Illinois in Nashville, Tenn.
	February
2	Tuesday	at Notre Dame
6	Saturday	vs. Georgia Tech
8	Monday	vs. Louisville
13	Saturday	at No. 4 Duke
20	Saturday	at Wake Forest
22	Monday	vs. No. 24 Miami
27	Saturday	at Virginia Tech
	March
2	Tuesday	at Pittsburgh
6	Saturday	vs. No. 4 Duke
9–13	Tues.-Sat.	ACC tournament in Greensboro

Photo via miamihurricanes.com